<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechDairy &#187; adoption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techdairy.com/tag/adoption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techdairy.com</link>
	<description>technology the milky way</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:47:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Windows 7 enterprise adoption?</title>
		<link>http://techdairy.com/2009/11/11/windows-7-enterprise-adoption/</link>
		<comments>http://techdairy.com/2009/11/11/windows-7-enterprise-adoption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>milkman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdairy.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meh&#8230; not so much.

IT leaders who spoke to Computerworld at the Society for Information Management&#8217;s SIMposium 09 conference this week in Seattle say their companies remain almost completely running Windows XP on the desktop.
Despite the eight years that have passed since XP&#8217;s release, they expressed little urgency to upgrade to Windows 7.

I noticed that the companies they ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh&#8230; <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140660/Enterprises_like_don_t_love_Windows_7?source=rss_news">not so much</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 8px; margin-left: 0px; padding: 0px;">IT leaders who spoke to <em>Computerworld</em> at the <a style="cursor: pointer; text-decoration: underline; color: #000099;" href="http://www.simnet.org/Programs/SIMposium/Program/tabid/170/Default.aspx" target="new">Society for Information Management&#8217;s SIMposium 09 conference</a> this week in Seattle say their companies remain almost completely running Windows XP on the desktop.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 8px; margin-left: 0px; padding: 0px;">Despite the eight years that have passed since XP&#8217;s release, they expressed little urgency to upgrade to Windows 7.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I noticed that the companies they interviewed aren&#8217;t <em>exactly </em>who I would call &#8220;tech heavy&#8221; companies.  They use Sunoco (the petroleum company), Meuller Water Products (??), and Oregon State university.  Hmm.. SUPER credible enterprise sources.</p>
<p>Regardless, this got me to reminiscing about the good ole days, when milk was brought to your doorstep and Operating System upgrades weren&#8217;t just annoyances that only upgraded the look and feel and not really much else.  Operating System upgrades used to MEAN something.  You had to do it or you couldn&#8217;t work efficiently.  You were actually getting an upgrade.  Today, Operating System upgrades [from Microsoft] aren&#8217;t necessary in order for the majority of computer users to get their work done.  I mean, XP has been around for 8 years.  DEAR GOD that&#8217;s ancient!</p>
<p>Can somebody please make an Operating System that actually increases productivity?  That would be neat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techdairy.com/2009/11/11/windows-7-enterprise-adoption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

